No. | Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant’s name Year of birth | Period of detention | Court which issued detention order/examined appeal | Length of detention | Specific defects | Other complaints under well‑established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) |
30/11/2010 | Sergey Aleksandrovich MALYSHEV 1979 | 01/07/2010 to 13/04/2011 | Oktyabrskiy District Court of Moscow,
Moscow City Court | 9 month(s) and 13 day(s)
| failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. | Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - detention authorised by the Ostankinskiy District Court of Moscow on 02/07/2010. The detention order was upheld on appeal by the Moscow City Court on 06/09/2010 (66 days). | 1,700 | |
06/03/2017 | Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich TYSHKO 1972 | 28/10/2015 to 16/03/2016
02/08/2016 to 10/05/2017 | Sovetskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk,
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court | 4 month(s) and 18 day(s)
9 month(s) and 9 day(s) | failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. | Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - detention order of 14/11/2016 examined and upheld on appeal on 17/01/2017 | 2,000 | |
12/04/2017 | Rustem Valeriyanovich KHAMZIN 1977 | 04/02/2015 to 30/07/2018 | Kirovskiy District Court of Ufa,
Supreme Court of Bashkortostan Republic,
Privolzhskiy Military District Court | 3 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 27 day(s)
| Collective detention orders. The applicant’s detention pending the examination of the case file lasted for almost a year. The Government did not argue that the prolonged period of the applicant’s examination of the case file in his case was due to any objective reasons (such as the volume of the case file). Neither did the domestic courts examine whether there had been any delays attributable to the investigating authorities. There were no attempts on the part of the domestic authorities to speed up the applicant’s examination of the case file by making new arrangements. Moreover, the protracted length of that examination process evidently benefited the investigating authorities, who completed their investigation in the meantime. The trial of the applicant’s case lasted for almost a year. Although there could have existed relevant and sufficient grounds for the applicant’s detention at some stages of the proceedings, the domestic authorities failed to provide relevant and specific justification for the continued application of the measure of restraint, coupled with the lack of diligence on their part. |
| 4,700 | |
12/05/2017 | Aleksandr Valeryevich KORNEV 1987 | 04/02/2015 to 30/07/2018 | Kirovskiy District Court of Ufa,
Supreme Court of Bashkortostan Republic,
Privolzhskiy Military District Court | 3 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 27 day(s)
| Collective detention orders. The applicant’s detention pending the examination of the case file lasted for almost a year. The Government did not argue that the prolonged period of the applicant’s examination of the case file in his case was due to any objective reasons (such as the volume of the case file). Neither did the domestic courts examine whether there had been any delays attributable to the investigating authorities. There were no attempts on the part of the domestic authorities to speed up the applicant’s examination of the case file by making new arrangements. Moreover, the protracted length of that examination process evidently benefited the investigating authorities, who completed their investigation in the meantime. The trial of the applicant’s case lasted for almost a year. Although there could have existed relevant and sufficient grounds for the applicant’s detention at some stages of the proceedings, the domestic authorities failed to provide relevant and specific justification for the continued application of the measure of restraint, coupled with the lack of diligence on their part. |
| 4,700 | |
04/05/2017 | Artem Mikhaylovich ZYULIN 1981 | 02/12/2014 to 05/05/2017 | Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan,
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic | 2 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 4 day(s)
| use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 3,400 | |
07/08/2017 | Timur Nikolayevich MALYGIN 1996 | 12/04/2015 to 03/10/2017 | Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan;
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic | 2 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 22 day(s)
| Collective detention orders; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding. |
| 3,400 | |
23/08/2017 | Givi Borisovich DZHAGMAIDZE 1979 | 17/03/2017 to 20/11/2019
| Georgiyevsk Town Court;
Stavropol Regional Court | 2 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 4 day(s) | As the case progressed, use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 3,800 | |
21/08/2017 | Denis Sergeyevich KHOROBRYKH 1987 | 22/01/2015 to 03/10/2017 | Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan;
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic | 2 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 12day(s)
| Collective detention orders; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding. | Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan during the criminal proceedings against the applicant,
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of the complaint about the placement in a metal cage | 9,750 | |
24/04/2018 | Rafis Ravilevich NASYBULLIN 1980 | 22/11/2016 to 19/02/2019 | Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan;
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic | 2 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 29 day(s)
| use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; “white-collar” crime; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. | Art. 5 (4) - deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention - The applicant was not provided with legal assistance at the appellate hearing against the detention order on 02/03/2018 (Svipsta v. Latvia no. , 9 March 2006, § 129)
| 3,500 |
No. | Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant’s name Year of birth | Representative’s name and location | Period of detention | Court which issued detention order/examined appeal | Length of detention | Specific defects | Other complaints under well‑established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) |
05/11/2007 | Aleksandr Voldemarovich PEYET 1969 |
| 05/07/2006 to 30/07/2007 | Zavolzhskiy District Court of Tver, Tver Regional Court | 1 year(s) and 26 day(s)
| fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - detention in the absence of a decision authorising it for 19 days (05- 24/07/2017) (Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. , §§ 144-151, ECHR 2005‑X (extracts));
Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - Detention order of the Zavolzhskiy District Court of Tver of 30/05/2007 was upheld on appeal by the Tver Regional Court on 19/07/2007 (1 month 19 days) | 3,900 | |
27/12/2014 | Vladimir Antonovich ROZHIN 1996 |
| 24/03/2014 to 05/05/2015 | Dorogoilovskiy District Court of Moscow; Moscow City Court | 1 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 12 day(s)
| fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. | Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - placement in a metal cage in the hearings before the Solntsevskiy District Court of Moscow (conviction on 05/05/2015)
| 9,750 | |
12/10/2015 | Ruslan Sergeyevich PYLAYEV 1976 |
| 08/10/2014 to 23/05/2016 | Leninskiy District Court of Vladivostok, Pervorechenskiy District Court of Vladivostok, Primorye Regional Court, Supreme Court of the Russian Federation | 1 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 16 day(s)
| fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. |
| 2,300 | |
22/03/2017 | Andrey Yuryevich MAKAROV 1979 | Yefremova Yekaterina Viktorovna Moscow | 16/07/2015 to 29/05/2017 | Vologda Town Court; Vologda Regional Court | 1 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 14 day(s)
| failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. In the decision of 17/11/2016 the Court examined the applicant’s complaint under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention regarding the period of his detention from 31/07/2012 to 16/07/2015. The application (no.40586/15) was struck out of the Court’s list of cases on the basis of Article 39 of the Convention, because the Government offered a unilateral declaration acknowledging a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the applicant’s detention until 16/07/2015. The declaration was accepted by the applicant. |
| 2,700 | |
31/07/2017 | Yuriy Vladimirovich SHAGAYKO 1982 |
| 18/12/2015 to 21/03/2017 | Sovetskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court | 1 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 4 day(s)
| fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. |
| 1,800 | |
26/08/2017 | Viktor Aleksandrovich VASILYEV 1958 |
| 30/08/2014 to 23/03/2018 | Basmannyy District Court of Moscow; Moscow City Court | 3 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 24 day(s)
| failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention; as the case progressed, failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. |
| 4,800 | |
30/08/2017 | Aleksandr Mikhaylovich KNYAZEV 1994 |
| 06/07/2015 to 03/10/2017 | Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan; Vakhitovskiy District Court of Kazan; Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic | 2 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 28 day(s)
| collective detention orders; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. |
| 3,000 | |
04/04/2019 | Aleksey Vyacheslavovich SUSHKOV 1977 | Znamenshchikov Yevgeniy Vladimirovich Lipetsk | 31/08/2018 to 19/07/2019 | Pravoberezhniy District Court of Lipetsk; Lipetsk Regional Court | 10 month(s) and 20 day(s)
| fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; “white-collar” crime; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. |
| 1,300 | |
11/04/2019 | Viktor Vadimovich FEDOSEYEV 1993 | Yeliseyev Oleg Viktorovich Moscow | 09/09/2018 pending | Khamovnicheskiy District Court of Moscow; Moscow City Court | More than 2 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 16 day(s)
| fragility of the reasons employed by the courts. | Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - appeal against detention order of 11/09/2018 was examined only on 26/11/2018 | 3,700 | |
07/05/2019 | Igor Nikolayevich SHVETS 1965 | Zhuravlev Stanislav Igorevich Moscow | 13/04/2018 pending | Basmannyy District Court of Moscow, Moscow City Court | More than 2 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 12 day(s)
| use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; “white-collar” crime | Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - with regard to placement in a metal cage during hearings,
Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - detention in a metal cage during numerous hearings in the Basmannyy District Court of Moscow; starting on 13/04/2018; proceedings are still pending | 9,750 |
No. | Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant’s name Date of birth
| Representative’s name and location | Period of detention | Court which issued detention order/examined appeal | Length of detention | Specific defects | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) |
21/02/2005 | Aleksandr Vitalyevich DIKIN 02/02/1972 | Dikin Denis Mikhaylovich Nizhniy Novgorod | 18/06/2004 to 04/08/2006 | Bogorodsk Town Court; Sovetskiy District Court of Nizhniy Novgorod; Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court | 2 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 18 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding. |
| 10,750 (under the unilateral declaration submitted by the Government)
2,900 (under the present judgment) | |
30/03/2017 | Artur Raulevich SALIMOV 05/09/1986 |
| 04/02/2015 to 30/07/2018 | Kirovskiy District Court of Ufa; the Supreme Court of the Republic of Bashkortostan | 3 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 27 day(s)
| Collective detention orders; the applicant’s detention pending the examination of the case file lasted for almost a year. The Government did not argue that the prolonged period of the applicant’s examination of the case file in his case was due to any objective reasons (such as the volume of the case file). Neither did the domestic courts examine whether there had been any delays attributable to the investigating authorities. There were no attempts on the part of the domestic authorities to speed up the applicant’s examination of the case file by making new arrangements. Moreover, the protracted length of that examination process evidently benefited the investigating authorities, who completed their investigation in the meantime. The trial of the applicant’s case lasted for almost a year. Although there could have existed relevant and sufficient grounds for the applicant’s detention at some stages of the proceedings, the domestic authorities failed to provide relevant and specific justification for the continued application of the measure of restraint, coupled with the lack of diligence on their part. |
| 4,700 | |
29/03/2017 | Danis Miratovich FAYZRAKHMANOV 04/09/1988 |
| 04/02/2015 to 30/07/2018 | Kirovskiy District Court of Ufa; the Supreme Court of the Republic of Bashkortostan | 3 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 27 day(s)
| Collective detention orders; the applicant in the present case was a co-defendant in the case of Mr Salimov (see application no. above). The findings of the Court in Mr Salimov’s case as regards specific defects are fully applicable to the present case. |
| 4,700 | |
27/03/2017 | Rinat Ranifovich NURLYGAYANOV 03/01/1991 |
| 04/02/2015 to 30/07/2018 | Kirovskiy District Court of Ufa; the Supreme Court of the Republic of Bashkortostan | 3 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 27 day(s) | Collective detention orders; the applicant in the present case was a co-defendant in the case of Mr Salimov (see application no. above). The findings of the Court in Mr Salimov’s case as regards specific defects are fully applicable to the present case. |
| 4,700 | |
09/04/2018 | Magomedkamil Magomedzapirovich MANSUROV 05/05/1987 | Panfilov Dmitriy Vladimirovich Moscow | 15/02/2018 to 30/03/2020 | Khoroshevskiy District Court of Moscow; Moscow City Court | 2 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 16 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. |
| 500 (under the unilateral declaration submitted by the Government)
3,200 (under the present judgment) | |
06/08/2018 | Maksim Mikhaylovich BATISHCHEV 30/07/1989 | Kopteyeva Anastasiya Vladimirovna Chita | 12/10/2016 to 21/08/2018 | Mogochinskiy District Court of the Zabaykalskiy Region; Zabaykalskiy Regional Court | 1 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 10 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. |
| 2,700 | |
15/08/2018 | Oksana Viktorovna KRAVCHENKO 28/01/1974 | Bulysov Roman Yevgenyevich Moscow | 17/02/2016 to 10/07/2019 | Basmanniy District Court of Moscow; Moscow City Court; Ostankinskiy District Court of Moscow; Nikulinskiy District Court of Moscow; appeal: Moscow City Court | 3 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 24 day(s)
| Failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention; collective detention orders; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts. |
| 4,600 | |
28/08/2018 | Yevgeniy Dmitriyevich STASHCHENKO 29/03/1995 | Uporov Igor Nikolayevich Yekaterinburg | 14/03/2016 to 27/11/2018 | Severouralsk Town Court; Nizhnetagilskiy Garrison Court; Sverdlovsk Regional Court; Uralskiy Military District Court | 2 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 14 day(s)
| Use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; collective detention orders; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 3,800 | |
27/08/2018 | Ivan Viktorovich BUFTYAK 18/08/1988 |
| 20/08/2014 to 02/04/2020 | Balashikha Town Court of the Moscow Region; Noginsk Town Court; Moscow Regional Court | 5 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 14 day(s)
| Failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention; collective detention orders. |
| 6,500 | |
04/02/2019 | Andrey Sergeyevich GOBUZOV 16/06/1981 |
| 17/01/2018 to 06/05/2019 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court; Zheleznodorozhniy District Court of Krasnoyarsk | 1 year(s) and 3 month(s) and 20 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts. | Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms in the Zheleznodorozhniy District Court of Krasnoyarsk at a number of hearings from 27/04/2018 to 31/10/2018. | 9,750 | |
09/10/2018 | Emin Orudzhali ogly GAMIDOV 07/10/1985 |
| 23/01/2018 to 24/12/2019 | Tsentralnyy District Court of Volgograd; Volgograd Regional Court | 2 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 11 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. |
| 2,600 | |
30/10/2018 | Olga Mikhaylovna FROLOVA 30/05/1980 | Panfilov Dmitriy Vladimirovich Moscow | 16/10/2016 To 20/06/2019 | Tambov Regional Court | More than 3 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 18 day(s)
| Use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice, particularly as the case progressed; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding as the case progressed; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts on charges of fraud (commercial activity); failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention.
| Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - appeal review of Tambov Regional Court on 10/08/2018 (66 days after the extension order of 19/06/2018); extension order of 21/09/2018 was examined on 31/10/2018 (40 days); extension order of 16/11/2018 was examined on 26/12/2018 (40 days); extension order of 01/11/2018 was examined on 11/12/2018 (40 days). | 4,900 | |
23/10/2018 | Vladimir Vladimirovich SOBOLEV 30/06/1975 |
| 09/10/2013 to 18/07/2017
05/06/2018 to 13/12/2018 | Kuzminskiy District Court of Moscow; Moscow City Court | 3 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 10 day(s)
6 month(s) and 9 day(s) | Failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention; collective detention orders; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding. |
| 5,700 | |
25/10/2018 | Vasiliy Sergeyevich USTINOV 25/04/1984 | Aleksandrova Lyudmila Aleksandrovna Krasnodar | 09/06/2017 to 19/03/2020 | Prikubansky District Court of Krasnodar; Krasnodar Regional Court | 2 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 11 day(s) | Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; white-collar crime; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention |
| 3,900 | |
25/10/2018 | Yelena Valentinovna SELIVERSTOVA 02/01/1971 |
| 08/10/2014 to 04/09/2018 | Samarskiy District Court of Samara; Samara Regional Court | 3 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 28 day(s)
| Use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice, particularly as the case progressed; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; collective detention orders; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 5,300 | |
02/11/2018 | Sergey Aleksandrovich SHAKHMAN 29/08/1973 | Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich Moscow | 04/10/2016 to 11/09/2018 | Moscow City Court | 1 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 8 day(s)
| Collective detention orders; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding. The Court has already found a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the applicant’s detention starting on 04/10/2016 (see Pavlov and Others v. Russia, [Committee], nos. and 7 others, 11 January 2018). The applicant, nevertheless, stayed in pre-trial detention after the Court’s judgment of 11/01/2018 until the investigator’s decision of 11/09/2018 to release him. | Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate, compensation in conjunction with Article 5 (1) and Article 5 (4) of the Convention – in particular, lack of compensation for unlawful arrest or detention in relation to the excessive length of pre-trial detention and to a delay in examination of an appeal against an extension order (see Alekhin v. Russia, no. , §§ 148-155, 30 July 2009);
Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention- the applicant’s appeal against the decision of the Savelovksiy District Court of Moscow of 21/06/2018 was upheld on appeal by the Moscow City Court on 30/07/2018 (Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. , §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) | 1,400 | |
07/12/2018 | Grigoriy Ulyanovich PIRUMOV 09/06/1962 | Zykov Andrey Leonidovich Moscow | 17/05/2018 to 12/08/2019 | Basmanniy District Court of Moscow; Moscow City Court | More than 2 year(s) and 17 day(s)
| failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding. |
| 1,700 | |
30/11/2018 | Andrey Valentinovich UTKIN 23/11/1966 | Polozov Kirill Borisovich Moscow | 05/12/2017 to 16/08/2019 | Leninskiy Distrcit Court of Stavropol; Stavropol Regional Court | 1 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 12 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint in relation to a charge for a non-violent crime. |
| 2,500 | |
13/12/2018 | Aleksandr Petrovich DOLMATOV 12/05/1977 | Aksenova Yuliya Vladimirovna Volgograd | 14/05/2015 to 25/07/2018 | Sovetskiy District Court of Volgograd; Volgograd Regional Court | 3 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 12 day(s)
| Use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 4,300 | |
12/12/2018 | Denis Bakhodirzhonovich GULAMOV 21/02/1986 | Urychev Aleksandr Vitalyevich Chelyabinsk | 15/06/2017 to 13/04/2020 | Supreme Court of the Karelia Republic; Metallurgicheskiy District Court of Chelyabinsk; Novosibirsk Regional Court; Chelyabinsk Regional Court | 2 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 18 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention; collective detention orders. | Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms during the hearings in Novosibirsk Regional Court and Tsentralniy District Court of Novosibirsk | 9,750 | |
13/12/2018 | Vladimir Vladimirovich SURKOV 28/04/1983 | Aksenova Yuliya Vladimirovna Volgograd | 21/05/2015 to 25/07/2018 | Sovetskiy District Court of Volgograd; Volgograd Regional Court | 3 year(s) and 2 month(s) and 5 day(s) | Use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice, particularly as the case progressed; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 4,300 | |
10/01/2019 | Pavel Nikolayevich PETROV 13/07/1985 | Denisov Dmitriy Arkadyevich Astrakhan | 20/04/2018 to 17/07/2019 | Kirovskiy District Court of Astrakhan; Volodarskiy District Court of Astrakhan Region; Astrakhan Regional Court | More than 2 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 14 day(s) | Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; collective detention orders. |
| 1,700 | |
10/12/2018 | Yuliya Anatolyevna VERPEKINA 30/11/1986 |
| 21/02/2018 pending | Leninsky District Court of the Stavropol Region; the Stavropol Regional Court | 2 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 13 day(s) | Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice. |
| 3,100 | |
14/12/2018 | Nataliya Igorevna KOZHANOVA 30/08/1955 | Vladimirov Andrey Vladimirovich Yoshkar-Ola | 13/04/2017 pending | Basmannyy District Court of Moscow; Moscow City Court | More than 3 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 21 day(s) | Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding. |
| 4,200 | |
04/01/2019 | Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich NIKOLAYENKO 19/02/1980 | Solovyev Yuriy Germanovich St Petersburg | 30/05/2018 pending | St Petersburg City Court; Kuybyshevsky District Court of St Petersburg | 1 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 3 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. | Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention – 30 days for judicial review of the detention order of 01/06/2018, appealed on 04/06/2018, which was examined by the St Petersburg City Court on 04/07/2018. | 3,500 | |
10/01/2019 | Ruslan Makhmudovich GADZHIYEV 27/12/1985 | Klyubin Sergey Nikolayevich Velikiy Novgorod | 19/05/2018 to 13/03/2019 | Novgorod District Court of the Novgorod Region; Novgorod Regional Court | 9 month(s) and 23 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice. |
| 1,300 | |
27/12/2018 | Yuriy Aleksandrovich LOSKUTOV 16/11/1989 |
| 10/10/2017 pending | Nevskiy District Court of St Petersburg; Kolpinskiy District Court of St Petersburg; St Petersburg City Court | More than 2 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 24 day(s)
| Use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 3,600 |
No. | Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant’s name Year of birth | Representative’s name and location | Period of detention | Court which issued detention order/examined appeal | Length of detention | Specific defects | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) |
15/03/2017 | Andrey Rashitovich IKRAMOV 1973 | Kulapov Vitaliy Viktorovich Moscow | 03/03/2015 to 06/02/2018 | Basmannyy District Court of Moscow; Moscow City Court | 2 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 4 day(s)
| Use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. | Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - complaint about detention order of 16/08/2016 was dealt with by the appellate court on 27/09/2016; complaint about detention order of 18/10/2016 was dealt with by the appellate court on 08/12/2016. | 4,400 | |
05/04/2017 | Yuriy Baronovich KUDZAGOV 1977 |
| 11/04/2012 to 21/11/2016 | Mytishchi Town Court, Moscow Regional Court | 4 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 11 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; collective detention orders; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 6,200 | |
07/03/2017 | Ramil Rafikovich ZALYAYEV 1966 |
| 13/01/2014 to 09/06/2017 | Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan, Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan
| 3 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 28 day(s)
| Failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 4,600 | |
21/03/2017 | Ilyas Miskhatovich SABIRZYANOV 1969 |
| 26/01/2013 to 18/10/2017 | Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan, Supreme Court of Republic of Tatarstan | 4 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 23 day(s)
| Failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice. |
| 6,400 | |
26/01/2018 | Nikita Alekseyevich YASHKIN 1981 | Shein Yevgeniy Valentinovich St Petersburg | 25/10/2014 to 19/09/2018 | St Petersburg City Court | 3 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 26 day(s)
| Use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 5,300 | |
13/05/2019 | Aleksandr Yevgenyevich FRIDRIKH 1993 |
| 11/10/2018 to 27/05/2019 | Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk; Krasnoyarsk Regional Court | 7 month(s) and 17 day(s)
| Use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice. | Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - appeal against detention order of 25/12/2018 was examined only on 22/01/2019;
Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate, compensation for unlawful arrest or detention - lack of effective remedy against excessive length of detention and against lack of speediness of review of detention;
Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - placement in metal cages during hearings in the Tsentralnyy District Court of Krasnoyarsk from 12/10/2018 to 27/05/2019. | 9,750 | |
03/06/2019 | Vladimir Leonidovich TORSHIN 1963 |
| 31/05/2017 to 17/05/2019 | Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk; Krasnoyarsk Regional Court | 1 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 18 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; collective detention orders; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding. | Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - placement of the applicant on a number of occasions in a metal cage in the court room of the Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk; leading to the conviction on 17/05/2019;
Art. 13 lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings. | 9,750 |
No. | Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant’s name Year of birth
| Representative’s name and location | Period of detention | Court which issued detention order/examined appeal | Length of detention | Specific defects | Other complaints under well‑established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) |
02/10/2019 | Sergey Ivanovich SOKOLOV 1985 |
| 15/02/2018 to 05/02/2020 | Berezovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court | 1 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 22 day(s)
| Use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; collective detention orders, failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. | Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - detention order of the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court of 21/08/2019, appeal decision of the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court of 17/09/2019 (25 days). | 2,500 | |
16/07/2019 | Nikolay Fedorovich ILYINSKIY 1990 |
| 24/11/2017 to 01/04/2019 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court | 1 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 9 day(s)
| Failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. | Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;
Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport since 30/11/2017 on numerous occasions between detention facilities and the courthouse; no/ restricted access to potable water, overcrowding, no/ restricted access to toilet. | 2,500 | |
27/09/2019 | Aleksey Vladimirovich NEPOMNYASHCHIKH 1994 |
| 19/02/2018 to 02/12/2019 | Leninskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court | 1 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 14 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention; reliance predominantly on the seriousness of the charges and complexity of the case. |
| 2,000 | |
28/10/2019 | Nasrulla Bagautdinovich MAGOMEDOV 1992 | Rokotyanskaya Tatyana Ivanovna Volgograd | 24/04/2019 pending | Tsentralnyy District Court of Volgograd; Volgograd Regional Court | More than 1 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 16 day(s)
| Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. |
| 2,100 | |
22/10/2019 | Magomed-Salyakh Lechiyevich BIGAYEV 1971 | Minenkov Sergey Aleksandrovich Moscow | 28/03/2019 to 02/02/2021 | Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, Moscow City Court | 1 year(s) and 10 month(s) and 6 day(s) | Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint. |
| 2,000 | |
31/10/2019 | Vladimir Sergeyevich CHERNIKOV 1982 | Kamikhin Gennadiy Nikolayevich Voronezh | 10/09/2018 pending | Leninskiy District Court of Voronezh; Voronezh Regional Court | More than 2 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 1 day(s) | Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice. |
| 2,700 | |
22/10/2019 | Ayzat Rafikovich KALIMULLIN 1974 |
| 25/10/2016 to 02/12/2019 | Naberezhnyy Chelny Town Court; Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic | 3 year(s) and 1 month(s) and 8 day(s) | Failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 3,200 | |
21/11/2019 | Andrey Pavlovich BELENIN 1980 | Dvornikov Anton Nikolayevich Moscow | 31/01/2019 to 14/10/2020 | Khoroshevskiy District Court of Moscow | 1 year(s) and 8 month(s) and 15 day(s) | Fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention. |
| 1,900 | |
25/11/2019 | Gera Yuryevna GUZHVA 1995 | Kiryanov Aleksandr Vladimirovich Taganrog | 27/11/2017 to 03/06/2020 | Novocherkassk Town Court of the Rostov Region, Rostov Regional Court; Third Appellate Court | 2 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 8 day(s)
| Failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding. |
| 2,700 |